Yeah.. its not that simple for how it was build in origin.. what a waste.. ![]()
Anyway, past two weeks after it has been bought, users cannot get a refund or give it back. Unless maybe they want to swap with something else, other assets.
Yeah.. its not that simple for how it was build in origin.. what a waste.. ![]()
Anyway, past two weeks after it has been bought, users cannot get a refund or give it back. Unless maybe they want to swap with something else, other assets.
and yes but this is another question that concerns the percentage of earnings that you impose as an owner if the SIMFLY platform makes it available to everyone from 0 to 60% I think that each owner is free to decide their own percentage no one forces you to keep it above 0% SIMFLY has not imposed rules of this kind until now…I instead am not sure about the presence YES or NO of the owner because let’s say the case is as Atnonio Ferrara said, that is that the owner is dead and is absent for his own problems in that case the situation is even more worrying than that of moving the percentage above 0% so you need to set annual DEADLINES with notifications or emails to verify if the USER is present or not.
This also applies to the activation of an asset, but I shouldn’t talk about that otherwise we’d be getting off the main topic of user verification and profit sharing. ASET is different if it’s a license, which is personal, for a personal airplane, and for an airport, which, in addition to being personal, is an asset that is part of the platform. Buying an airport and keeping it inactive for a month, six months, or even a whole year is detrimental to the entire SIMFLY community, so here too, deadlines should be imposed. For example, it’s like if a construction site were opened in your city to build an airport, a hospital, or simple housing, and that same construction site remained incomplete for a month, six months, a year, or even 10 years, as happens in reality in Italy. This is detrimental to society as a whole.
I think not everyone is right and not everyone is wrong. I understand that opinions are extremely personal, and logically, some lean toward “personal benefit,” while others lean toward “collective benefit.” I think it’s prudent to consider the platform as a whole when it comes to inactive airports, yes, but I also understand that it’s an asset, an asset purchased by someone who holds rights to it and does whatever they want with it. Perhaps one option would be to plan for airport maintenance costs in the future, even if minimal or symbolic. This is something that happens at the FSE, for example… I have assets there for years and I don’t use the platform. But if I don’t go there regularly and replenish the food, the asset is frozen, and after 90 days, if I don’t seek a solution, it goes to auction. This forces the asset owner to indirectly say, “I’m alive,” and I’m still interested in keeping my airport. I’m paying for its maintenance, monthly, annually, or whatever.
We are also talking about a platform that involves real money. As also states the SimFly wiki, even if in the future when there will be expenses to pay, if not paid and the airport stops earning xp or pax due to debts, obviously the asset remains of the owner, its his. But this case we are talking about an asset activated. Not about assets not even activated. What if a user buys 50 assets and doesn’t even activates them for months or years?is SimFly a kind of bank, that holds your assets(money) for ever, like a deposit of some sort? Why should it hold your assets in the system for ever without even using them? Despide other platforms, I occasionally use Fse and there are lots of “assets” not used for years, in fact I’m bringing back home someone else small airplane from Antarctic to north Dakota, but we are still talking about fictional money, not real like in simfly. If an active user wants to keep his assets unactivated, for some strategic “logic” or not , ok, its his choice. But i was talking about the eventuality of a user that has bought assets, and the user is not active, maybe abandoned everything. This could happen more frequently then we suppose, look at FSe for example. So, as we are in a platform that involves real income and real money to buy assets, what a good and logic management should be taken? Just this..