Me personally i got two accounts with simfly i give the reason why ,we are 3 friends who pay for airport and planes they got their own account for license only and i act like president of the main account my second account its only for license but i only fly one plane at the time when im able to do , now don’t know if people try to fly 2 or 3 plane on same time but for me they’re not passionate or try to make simfly for living or try to get bigger too fast but don’t jealous anyone here if they got big airport or big planes they pay for that and this make simfly ongoing for better thanks everyone if im wrong will comply with the rules
1 Like
Roberto has already clearly stated that this doesn’t cause any harm to SimFly’s economy. So what’s your real issue? Are you simply bothered by my earnings? If you think it’s so advantageous, then do it yourself. But please, stop constantly pointing fingers at me. Focus on your own journey and let everyone enjoy the SimFly experience in their own way.
Hello, how are you? Good morning…
We all know what’s right and what isn’t. We all know what to do. I suppose we’re all grown-up human beings. And that’s the bad part: being human. We’re accustomed and addicted to trying to do the “wrong” thing, what’s wrong, whether it’s allowed or not. In my case, I always try to do the “right” thing as long as it doesn’t harm or undermine the benefit of others… One account, two accounts… etc. And well, it depends on each person’s morality and ethics. I stick with just one account and try to do the right thing. That way, I promote and collaborate with others. There are others who don’t, but oh well, that’s not my problem anymore. Just do the right thing and that’s it. Always remember this: “We are adults!” Behave accordingly. Good luck and have a good flight!
2 Likes
Hi! I’m doing well, thank you for your message, and good morning to you too.
But who really decides what’s right and what’s wrong? On SimFly, we’re thousands of users — over 10,000 registered — yet it always seems to be the same 3 or 4 people trying to impose their own rules, often even going against the official guidance from the administrators. They want to take control! Honestly, it’s this kind of attitude that I find truly questionable.
Let’s speak honestly about multiaccounts: are they really such a bad thing? Personally, I don’t think so. A multiaccount can actually bring real value to the platform. It purchases more assets, financially supports SimFly, rents aircraft from other users which stimulates the internal economy, and when it lands with three planes at other users’ airports, it makes them earn three times as many Pax. Isn’t that also a positive contribution to the community?
Maybe it’s time to stop seeing everything in black and white and start evaluating situations with more balance. In the end, what should really matter is the intention: if someone acts in good faith, with respect for others, and contributes to the growth of the platform — then what’s the real problem?
I’m sorry to have to say it so clearly, but the truth is that, too often, behind certain criticisms there’s nothing more than plain jealousy. And that, yes, is truly a shame.
Multi account does not support simfly. You can support simfly buying the same assets with only one account. Multiaccount only support you.
It’s embarrassing how shameless and arrogant you are, boasting about how you use multiple accounts. With all the audacity in the world—same names, flying together—you act like you’re untouchable.
We will keep talking about the multiple accounts whenever we want, no matter how uncomfortable it makes you.
2 Likes
Everyone has the right to their own opinion, but accusing and insulting others doesn’t make your arguments any more valid.
There’s nothing “embarrassing” about using multiple accounts if it’s done transparently and without harming anyone. I have nothing to hide — everything I do is out in the open and in full compliance with the platform’s rules.
Multiaccounts, when managed properly, bring real value to SimFly. They purchase assets, rent aircraft from other users, generate traffic, and help others earn Pax. Saying they only serve to “support yourself” is simply wrong. The real issue isn’t multiaccounts — it’s the attitude of those who believe they have the right to judge and point fingers arrogantly.
Feel free to talk about multiaccounts as much as you want, but stop with the personal attacks against those who think differently. Respect should always come first, and no one here has the authority to place themselves above others.
You and the two or three people who agree with you are certainly not going to change the rules of an entire community. If you want to keep wasting your time investigating me, go ahead. In the meantime, I’ll continue on my path — calmly and confidently.
Hi guys, I still read posts that show resentment and anger, I post my opinion on the multiple accounts issue. SIMFLY is basically a platform dedicated to simulated flight… that is, the passion that unites us all. I repeat, “passion” is not something that today can make us stop working to earn only by flying in simulation. Maybe one day who knows… never say never in life… 
But today why instead of thinking about relaxing and trying to build our own position within the project, some are so busy watching what others are doing !! Relax take it easy… if some users use 2 or more accounts, in this beta phase, they will certainly not sink the economy. 
Fly peacefully and have clear skies for all… 
2 Likes
Gianni Romanisio non ho affatto nulla contro di te assolutamente me ne frego pero’ la questione multi account mi da fastidio perche’ tu puoi fare piu degli altri sia in PAX che in TOCHEN, mentre io come altri che hanno un solo account siamo svantaggiati rispetto a te. la vera colpa c’e’ l’ha SIMFLY che all’inizio a permesso tutto questo…io proposi un anche in DISCORD tempo fa un alternativa per far guadagnare piu pax e piu token a ci ha un single account facendo e proponendo missioni di contrabando merce preziosa o trasporto VIP o missioni percolose in luoghi remoti della terra o in aereoporti difficili o addirittura introdurre missioni militari con aerei militari ad alto rischio…tutto questo solo per pareggiare i conti con chi ha il multiaccount tutto qui, le opportunita devono essere uguali per tutti e non solo per pochi. te l’altro io non ti ho mai offeso o detto parole contro di te ma mi sono solo opposto alla politica del multi account che rende il gioco simfly discriminante per chi ha il single account.
Gianni Romanisio I have nothing against you at all I absolutely don’t care but the multi-account issue bothers me because you can do more than others both in PAX and in TOCHEN, while I and others who have only one account are disadvantaged compared to you. the real fault is SIMFLY who initially allowed all this…I also proposed in DISCORD some time ago an alternative to make those who have a single account earn more pax and more tokens by doing and proposing missions to smuggle precious goods or transport VIPs or dangerous missions in remote places on earth or in difficult airports or even introduce military missions with high-risk military aircraft…all this just to get even with those who have multi-accounts that’s all, the opportunities must be equal for everyone and not just for a few. you the other I have never offended you or said words against you but I only opposed the multi-account policy that makes the simfly game discriminatory for those who have a single account.
What if even who does this VIP missions, dangerous missions, and whatever you propose, also has a double account? what if a user as Gianni, with a double account, likes the high risk missions you suggest? Or these special missions are only for single account users? 
If they could detect who only has one account in order to do those missions, Giani would already be out. Because what Simfly lacks is an algorithm that can detect if you have a second account.
more than we lack algos, I say that there is no such algo. Gianni would be easy to detect, but someone that use different names and travel different routes, and use VPN, is impossible to detect… Detection is easy for unsophisticated abusers, but impossible for others. Therefore, restrictions are unenforceable, and a voluntary ban would be unfair. Honest people would comply (for sure including Gianni), while malicious actors would not, creating an imbalance. IMO code is law: we should define and enforce what is technically possible. We can make it complicated, for sure, make life more difficult by adding checks, but that’s all we can do.
I arrived late to this community. I discovered it on April 25, while many others joined 2 years before. My first thought was “wou! SimFly is fanfastic”
As Morfeus says, I am so passionated, and with that emotional condition I couldn’t see all that stuff you are commenting, and I was in a hurry to buy a License (there was no one available), an airplane, and an airport (very, very few available Cat3). I thought that was the minimum to start, but I was too anxious to get that. When I had the opportunity, I paid all in US$, (and not reduced).
After some weeks living with you and a bit more reflective, I consider that SimFly should have controlled the maximum number of assets per person. The only Cat 3 airport I bought… I think that should be Cat 2 (compared to others) and I felt very dissapointed to be late.
In that way, and being assets something finite, it should have been (if possible) more balanced and available to others. I think that I have a lot of time to enjoy, get PAX, XP and discoverings with just 3 assets. Why do I need to have… 40?? 50?? Come on! That frustrates me to get just the fourth, and that could be enough to enjoy and share this community with many others. It is a question of coexistence.
May be now is too late to control that figures. But CEOs, CIOs and XYZs: think other similar issues that can crop up to make this community gentle and be part of it all kind of profiles, thinkings and (all they are) very nice virtual pilots.
Good night!
I understand your concerns about multi-accounts and differences between users, but I’d like to offer a broader reflection on how the internal economy of SimFly actually works.
It is precisely this difference that brings value to the market.
Any environment based on a simulated economy — like SimFly — is built upon a fundamental principle: user differentiation.
If everyone grew at the same rate, with the same rewards, assets, and operational opportunities, we would see a general flattening that would seriously harm the structure of the marketplace.
In a market where everyone is the same, no one needs to rent, buy, or collaborate. The interdependence between users — which today creates value — would disappear. The aircraft rental market, asset exchanges, airport trading, and even missions would lose their meaning.
The presence of users with different growth levels — including those who manage more than one account — is not harmful in itself, as long as it complies with the platform’s rules and is not abusive. On the contrary, it creates dynamics that fuel interaction, commerce, and the circulation of TOCHEN and PAX.
The real risk is not the difference between players, but the idea of artificially making everyone equal. That kind of vision tends to paralyze the ecosystem, reducing the motivation to improve, invest, collaborate, and remain active.
In conclusion, it is perfectly valid to discuss rules and prevent unfair behavior. But claiming that everyone should grow in the exact same way could undermine the entire economic balance of the system, making it sterile and void of real value.
1 Like
This is unbelievable. This was all I needed to read. You have no shame.
According to you, we should thank you because you’re “saving the economy of the system,” because without rich people like you, the poor wouldn’t have anyone to rent from.
I might be able to live with your abuse, but every time you write something, it makes my stomach turn.
The worst part isn’t that you’re a cheat — the truly awful part is that you’re proud of it and even try to convince us that what you’re doing is wonderful.
Well, no, man!!! It’s not!! It’s shameful!!!
And the saddest part… is that they let you get away with it.
2 Likes
I understand that you have a very different opinion from mine, and you’re clearly showing your envy towards me — which, of course, you’re free to express.
However, when a discussion turns personal, the core topic is completely lost. I was talking about economic dynamics in a simulated system, with clear and verifiable arguments. You, instead, chose to reply with accusations, insults, and moral judgments — and quite rudely, I might add.
I never asked to be thanked, nor do I consider myself superior to anyone. I simply expressed a point of view that, in fact, is supported by many real and virtual economic simulations: total uniformity doesn’t create value — it destroys it.
If you choose to interpret this as arrogance or shame, that’s entirely your issue — not mine.
And please, do continue your investigation into me, and don’t forget to take good screenshots of all my assets.
That said, I won’t continue this discussion in this tone.
You confuse envy with shame, that’s why you do what you do.
You’re not the only one here with multiple accounts—at least the other guys try to stay under the radar, to hide so they won’t be called out. But not you. You wear your lack of decency like a badge of honor.
Simfly should rename the most important airport in Italy to “Gianni I The Cheater” in your honor. That way they can thank you for the great work you’re doing to improve the game’s economy, because thanks to you, other poor users will be able to rent YOUR planes and fly in YOUR airports.
Too bad Raffaella Carrà is no longer with us, because she could sing “Gianni Gianni Gianni Gi…” for you.
I’m writing just to clarify one thing, once and for all.
I have no interest in convincing you of anything, nor in proving who’s right or wrong.
It’s interesting how every time someone tries to offer a rational reflection on SimFly, there’s always someone who prefers to turn it into a personal attack.
I was talking about economic dynamics and the functioning of a system based on differences between users — concepts that exist in every serious simulation. I never insulted anyone, nor did I place myself above anyone.
If your reaction is so emotional and aggressive, maybe your issue isn’t with me, but with SimFly’s system itself.
Attacking me personally, accusing me of being “proud,” “shameful,” or a “cheater” just because I think differently from you says much more about you than it does about me.
I will continue to express my ideas with respect and reason. You’re free to continue with your theater.
I expressed an opinion based on logic and experience, regarding a simulated system. You chose to turn it into a personal outburst.
What you say doesn’t offend me — but it does say a lot about how you choose to deal with things.
If attacking me makes you feel better, go ahead. I’ll continue flying, building, and improving peacefully, as always.
Have a good day.
1 Like
Reminding of the unforgettable '80s..
…
Look at all these rumors surroundin’ me every day
I just need some time, some time to get away from
From all these rumors, I can’t take it no more…
2 Likes